Timeplan 2024 Vår - emne SOS-1018-1

Litteratur:

Bacchi, Carol and Goodwind, Susan (2016). Chapter 2. Making Politics Visible. The WPR Approach. in Poststructural Policy Analysis. A Guide to Practice. New York. Palgrave.

Foucault, Michel (1997). Kva er biopolitikk? Agora. 1(15). s. 9-29. (Del af Forelæsning fra 1976. Il faut défendre la société. Cours au College de France. Oversat af Roar Høstaker)

Ryle, Robin (2012). Chapter 1. What is Gender and Why Should We Care About It. in Questioning Gender. Los Angeles. Sage. s. 3-13

Adrian, Stine Willum, Skewes, Lea, Schwennesen, Nete. (2018): Introduction to feminist STS at work: Challenging dichotomies and privileges. Kvinder, Køn og Forskning (Women, Gender & Research), Vol. 27, No. 1,

Se Canvas

Hamran, Torunn (2007). Kvinneforeningene, institusjonsbyggingen og den nasjonale velferdspolitikken – nord-norge før 1940, Historisk tidsskrift, bind 86, Side 411–430 https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1504-2944-2007-03-04Links to an external site.

Kildal, Nanna (2013). Den norske velferdsstaten: Fra sosiale til kontraktbaserte rettigheter. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, vol. 16, nr. 2, s 87-95

Hatland, Aksel (2023). Velferdsstaten fra krise til konsolidering. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, Årgang 64, nr. 2-2023, s.147-163

Obligatorisk litteratur:

Ekerwald, Hedvig (2001). The Modernist Manifesto of Alva and Gunnar Myrdal: Modernization of Sweden and the Thirities and the Question of Sterilization, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society.14(3). P. 539-561

Roll-Hansen, Niels (1996).Norwegian Eugenics: Sterilization as social reform. In Broberg, G. and Roll-Hansen, Niels (eds.). Eugenics and the Welfare State. East Lansing. Michigan State University Press p.151 -189 (Læs fra s. 155)

Ekstra litteratur:

Koch, Lene (2004). The Meaning of Eugenics: Reflections on the Government of Genetic Knowledge in the Past and the Present. Science in Context. 17(3). P.315-331

Se i canvas

 Obligatorisk litteratur:

Murphy, Michelle (2018). 3. Against Population, Towards Alterlife. In Harway, Donna and Clarke, Adele. Making kin not population. Chicago. Prickly Press. P. 101-124

Bhatia, Rajani et al. (2020). A feminist exploration of ´populationism´: engaging contemporary forms of population control. Gender, Place and Culture. 27(3). P. 333-350

Se Canvas.

Stuvøy, Ingvill og Myong, Lene (2023). The Biopolitics of Parental Access: Cross-Readings of Transnational Adoption and Surrogacy in Denmark and Norway. Social Politics. Online

Van Wichelen, Sonja (2015). Scales of grievability: on moving children and the geopolitics of precariousness. Social & Cultural Geography. Vol. 16, No. 5, 552–566

Adrian, Stine Willum (2019): Rethinking Reproductive Selection, Traveling Transnationally for SpermLinks to an external site., BioSocieties. Online

Rexer, Gala (2023). The Materiality of Power and Bodily Matter(ing):Embodied Resistance in Palestine. Body and Society. 29(4). P. 2-28

Spilker, Kristin (2016). Norwegian Biopolitics in the First Decade of the 2000s: Family Politics and Assisted Reproduction Understood through the Concept of the Trickster in Lie, Merete and Lykke, Nina (eds.). Assisted Reproduction across Borders. London. Routledge.

Se Canvas.

Dahl, Hanne Marlene (2017). Struggles in (elderly) care. A Feminist View. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Kpittel 1 og 2 (s 1-60)

Brodin, Helene og Elin Peterson (2019). Equal Opportunities? Gendering and Racialising the Politics of Entrepreneurship in Swedish Eldercare. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research,28:2, 99-112

Ann Therese Lotherington, Aud Obstfelder & Gøril Ursin (2018). The Personal Is Political Yet Again: Bringing Struggles between Gender Equality and Gendered Next of Kin onto the Feminist Agenda, NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 26:2, 129-141

Huang, Genghua and Samuel Ampadu Oteng (2023) Gerontechnology for better elderly care and life quality: a systematic literature review. European Journal of Ageing. 20:27. Pp 1-20.

Schwiter, Karin and Jennifer Steiner (2020) Geographies of care work: The commodification of care, digital care futures and alternative caring visions. Geography Compass, Vol. 14, Issue 12. Pp 1-16.

Wright, James (2023) Humans and Technology. Inside Japan’s long experiment in automating elder care. MIT Technology Review, January 9, 2023. 7 sider. (Dette er en svært kort versjon av James Wright’s bok «Robots Won’t Save Japan»)

Se Canvas.